A Separate Peace The Dying Legacy Essays - Russian Revolution

A Separate Peace: The Dying Legacy By early 1918 in Russia, the Bolsheviks controlled only the north-western area of the Russian Empire (Petrograd and Moscow) together with the areas between and around them. Various opposition groups were formed against the Bolsheviks, under the new Provisional Government. The provisional government had proposed elections for a new assembly in late 1917; Lenin had seen that the Bolsheviks must act before this democratically elected government convened, but once in power, he allowed the elections to proceed. In the November 1917 polls, Bolshevik candidates won just under 25 per cent of the vote, while the moderate socialists polled over 40 per cent. Lenin sent his loyal troops to close down the constituent assembly the day after it convened. Russia was about to enter a bloody civil war, which was a culmination of the efforts of varied opposition groups to defeat the Bolsheviks, from which it would emerge into Leninist and Stalinist tyranny. The causes of the civil war are diverse. A confusion of governments and opponents existed, some based on minorities and nationalities. From these, the Lithuanians, Moldavians, and Ukrainians declared independence. There was a Polish dispute over rights of sovereignty which raised tensions between Poland and her communist neighbor that would lead to war. Moreover, leaders of anti-Bolsheviks known as the ?Whites? went to rebellion with the aim of establishing a power base and advancing from it to the Bolshevik stronghold (Years of Change, 402). With the ideal of ?Russia one and indivisible? (Alexeyev), the White forces consisted of three main groups: revolutionary groups hostile toward the Bolsheviks, former officers of the Imperial army resentful of ?betrayal at Brest Litvosk? (T A Morris) and national groups seeking independence for their particular minority. Lastly, according to T A Morris, the revolt Czechoslovak Legion was ? the greatest catalyst of civil conflict in Russia?. Alth ough the Legion had no specifically anti-Bolshevik aims, its resounding success against Soviet forces provided enormous encouragement for the White cause, and thus proved to be an external threat to the Bolshevik regime. All these factors were bound to culminate into a civil war, the legacies of which are painful, and yet necessary to some. In analyzing effects of the civil war on unity and stability, long term and short term effects should be taken into consideration. In response to the short term effects, the civil war created disorder in both the unity and stability of Russia, but in the long term, some argue that unity and stability was somewhat achieved through consistency. In relation to the former, rival factions were still around causing speculation on the effectiveness of a crumbled government. Moreover, Lenin and the Russian Communist party took control of the country. Workers' strikes, peasant uprisings, and a rebellion by the Kronshtadt garrison in favour of an all-socialist government were quickly crushed. In 1921 Lenin established the New Economic Policy to strengthen the country, which had been drained by seven years of turmoil and economic decline. On December 30, 1922, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was formally established when the ethnic territories of the former Russian Empire were united with the Russian Federated Socialist Republic. The civil war in Russia (1918-1920) decisively influenced the appearance of the first big political emigration of the 20th century on the social scene of Europe and the World. With the ideological and political conflicts intensified by the Bolsheviks to the point of exclusion, the Civil war has significantly influenced the quantity and the character of the Russian emigration. It is difficult (and almost impossible) to precisely determine the exact number of people that emigrated from Russia in the years of the Revolution, Civil war, and right after that (1917-1923/24). Most estimates point that in this period approximately 2 to 2.5 million people left Russia in this period,2 putting the Russian emigration among the most massive (political) migration of the modern era. In the early 1920s, the appearance of such a large number of emigrants, opened a number of demographic, practical, and political issues. One of the important side effects of the departure of large number of people from Russia was the fact that the international law regarding refugees (which is basically still used today) was built

Gay Marriage argument Essays

Gay Marriage argument Essays Gay Marriage argument Essay Gay Marriage argument Essay The issue of legalising cheery matrimony has ever been a affair of great contention in the United States. Many people believe that legalising cheery matrimony is immoral and unconstitutional. Untraditional. unlawful. and unethical are some of the many footings used to depict cheery matrimony. Not all persons feel this manner. The issue has created widespread division both politically and socially. Advocates strongly believe that cheery matrimony is a constitutional right. while the resistance claims it has excessively many societal disadvantages. In present twenty-four hours society the figure of peoples in support of cheery matrimony is higher than of all time. One of the many advocators for pro homosexual matrimony is Evan Wolfson. the laminitis and president of Freedom to Marry. Wolfson presents legion statements for the legalisation of cheery matrimony in his article Without Nationwide Gay Marriage. U. S. Government Discriminates. Using emotional. logical. and legal entreaty. Wolfson presents his statement. Same-sex twosomes should be able to observe their relationships through the bondage of matrimony merely like heterosexual twosomes. Many same-sex twosomes want to get married and they should be able to since it is at that place human right. Evan Wolfson explains it cleanly when he proclaimed Marriage is an of import minute in life when we make a public promise of love and dedication to the individual we are constructing a life with. and inquire our friends and household to back up us and keep us accountable. Couples who have made that committedness in life should hold the same committedness under the jurisprudence ; called matrimony. : It is unfair to free taxpayer citizens of this right. It is societies norm that matrimony should be between a adult male and adult female. but it is non written anyplace within the fundamental law. It is a saddening unfairness to know apart citizens due to their sexual orientation. This is suitably presented when Wolfson writes Under the jurisprudence. matrimony touches every facet of life. from birth to decease. with revenue enhancements in between. Denial of the freedom to get married is one of the harshest inequalities inflicted on sapphic and cheery families- discrimination by their ain government†¦particularly in these tough economic times. The benefits of matrimony should be extended to all person during the present economic state of affairs. Harmonizing to Wolfson. Withholding from these benefits by forestalling same sex matrimony is a premier illustration of favoritism. There is no logical to ground to forestall homosexual matrimony since it has been proven successful. Gay twosomes portion in the freedom to get married in six provinces and the District of Columbia ; the sky hasn’t fallen. Gay matrimony has been proven successful in other parts of the universe along with some of the United States. Same sex matrimony is deriving more and more credence. yet it is discriminated against province and federal authoritiess. The Federal authorities marks homosexual twosomes through the passage of DOMA ( Defense of Marriage Act ) . Wolfstan claims DOMA injuries married same-sex twosomes by keep backing the more than one thousand federal duties and protections accorded all other married twosomes. Benefits such as societal security subsister and wellness coverage are withheld from married twosomes. The fundamental law commands equal justness for all and Wolfson believes its clip to stay by our nation’s written jurisprudence. Although Evan Wolfson nowadayss valid points. there are many holes in his statement. The writer neglects many facets while portraying his ain thoughts. To get down with. why is it necessary to specify a relationship with the rubric of Marriage? If two people of the same sex want to be in a relationship. why non merely be together? The writer claims that Gay twosomes portion in the freedom to get married in six provinces and the District of Columbia ; the sky hasn’t fallen. In the actual sense this statement is true. but what about the rise in divorce rates in the six provinces and District of Columbia? The sky hasn’t fallen. but there may be negative effects to the legalisation of cheery matrimony. Wolfston besides charges the province and federal authoritiess with favoritism against homosexuals. It is the government’s occupation to delight the bulk. and if anti-gay statute law will make that. so be it. If same sex twosomes are offended with province policies. why can’t they move to a different province or state? Wolfson references many appropriate points. but why doesn’t he mention any outside beginnings? Supplying no information from experts in the Fieldss or resources challenges the credibleness of his statement. Marriage is traditionally defined as a brotherhood between a adult male and a adult female. non a adult female and a adult female. or adult male and a adult male. The legalisation of cheery matrimony would do societal and economic hazards that can’t be overlooked. In his article Opinion: Gay matrimony should non be made legal. Ryan Normandin presents legion legitimate grounds as to why cheery matrimony shouldn’t be legalized. Many cheery rights advocators believe that they have the right to get married whomever they want under the equal rights protection clause. but that is surely non the instance. As Normandin explains in his article. They claim that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees them the right to get married whomever they desire. including members of the same sex. To prohibit this would. in their heads. be favoritism. But do all people have the right to get married whomever they want already. with the exclusion of same-sex twosomes? No ; provinces have Torahs modulating matrimony. prohibiting first cousins from get marrieding. brothers and sisters from get marrieding. parents and offspring from get marrieding. and people from get marrieding animate beings. inanimate objects. or multiple other persons. The legalisation of cheery matrimony would open legal doors to other signifiers of relationships such as polygamous. incestuous. and other untraditional relationships. By the logic of cheery matrimony. everyone has an equal right to get married whomever or whatever he or she pleases. It is merely suiting that province and federal authoritiess regulate matrimony. he claims. Traditional matrimony is good to the American authorities. which makes it appropriate for twosomes to have revenue enhancement interruptions and legion benefits. Ryan Normnadin explains it best when he literates The principle is that males and females. when married. are more likely to reproduce. therefore guaranting the continuance of American society. It is surely to America’s advantage to hold citizens. so there exists a compelling province involvement warranting authorities subsidisation of heterosexual matrimony. Since traditional matrimony is assisting the United States procreate. it is in the government’s best involvement to subsidise matrimony that is increasing its figure of citizens. Many persons in favour of homosexual rights believe that felicity of same-sex twosomes is adequate a ground for its legalisation. Unfortunately. that is non the instance since happiness is non a compelling adequate statement when weighed against the drawbacks of cheery matrimony. One of the major drawbacks is that same sex twosome can non foster a kid decently. The well being of a kid can non be jeopardized for happiness. Although cheery twosomes can’t reproduce. unreal insemination and acceptance are some options. Although. these statements do non turn out a feasible option because complications can originate. Normandin refers to University of Canterbury professor Bruce J. Ellis to turn out this point. Professor Ellis’s research claims greater exposure to beget absence was strongly associated with elevated hazard for early sexual activity and adolescent gestation. These are hazards that can’t be taken lightly merely to do sapphic twosomes happy. There are besides hazards involved in rearing in respects male twosomes. The writer besides refers to Stanford psychologist Eleanor MacCoby who points out that mothers. on norm. may hold slightly stronger parental instincts’ when it comes to reacting to immature babies. It is of arrant importance for a kid to turn up with both a female parent and male parent. Harmonizing to Normandin’s beliefs. Happiness is non adequate ground to harm the hereafter of infinite kids. Ryan Normandin presents a compelling statement. but there are defects in many of his thoughts. For illustration. the writer compares cheery matrimony to incest and bestiality. Is it truly fair to compare cheery matrimony to such formidable Acts of the Apostless against nature? Bestiality and incest have far more negative effects so gay matrimony. so it is non just to compare them. They inability of homosexual twosomes to reproduce is another point Normandin brings approximately. Although this statement is valid. isn’t unreal insemination a tool that can assist sapphic twosomes reproduce? What about the 1000s of ignored kids male twosomes can salvage? Last. the writer quotes assorted professionals to indicate out that kids of same sex twosomes will hold complications due to an absent male parent or female parent. Studies show that this possibly true. but what about household members that can make full that absent function nowadays in same-sex twosomes? Can’t the grandma or aunt provide maternal attention to a kid of a male twosome? Why can’t a gramps or uncle act as a fatherlike figure for a sapphic couple’s kid? Normandin provided a really compelling statement. but there are minor uncertainties to his thoughts. After analysing both sides of the issue along with my anterior experiences and cognition. cheery matrimony should non be legalized. Both articles made valid points. but Ryan Normandin’s opinionated piece Opinion: Gay matrimony should non be made legal changed my perceptual experience on this issue wholly. Sing matrimony as a governmental issue. non a personal 1. do me recognize that matrimony isn’t merely approximately felicity. Marriage between a adult male and a adult female is good to the authorities. therefore it is allowed. Since same-sex matrimony doesn’t pose benefits. such as reproduction. to the United Sates or its citizens. it is either prohibited or extremely restricted. Reproduction is required for the endurance of any society and legalising cheery matrimony would hold reproducing unimportant. Gay matrimony besides causes desperate effects for the couple’s childs. I have witnessed my co-worker’s merely child. Marshall. with an absentee male parent figure. Due to a losing male parent. Marshall took portion with the incorrect crowd and disregarded all authorization. I have besides witnessed the psychological jobs with childs who are losing a female parent. My cousin. who has two female parents. is socially awkward and lacks basic conversation accomplishments. To guarantee the full wellness of a kid. they need both a female parent and a male parent figure to supply maternally and fatherlike inherent aptitudes. Same sex families are non ideal environments for kids. Another good point that Normandin posed was that the legalisation of cheery matrimony would open doors to other sort of relationships such as polygamy. This would doubtless take to farther deconstruction of matrimony and household. I besides believe same sex matrimony to hold damaging effects on society. A intelligence study I read claimed that legalising cheery matrimony in Scandinavia is linked to the cause of population diminution and higher divorce rates. Numerous researches province that homosexual relationships don’t last long term. The fact that Wolfson did non supply any outside beginnings was another factor that shaped my sentiment. I believe that outside beginnings make an statement much more believable. Challenging cultural. moral. societal values. the disadvantages of cheery matrimony greatly outweigh the advantages. Plants Cited Normandin. Ryan. Gay Marriage Should Not Be Made Legal – The Tech. Gay Marriage Should Not Be Made Legal – The Tech. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 06 July 2011. Web. 08 Sept. 2013. . Wolfson. Evan. Without Nationwide Gay Marriage. U. S. Government Discriminates. US News. U. S. News A ; World Report. 7 Oct. 2011. Web. 08 Sept. 2013. .

Warehousing management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Warehousing management - Essay Example When designing a warehouse the goods that are handled should be known. Spaciousness may not be beneficial to a warehouse because the distance that a person or a machine must walk is increased. Nevertheless, an extra space that is not used means that an extra cost is also used. Before designs are made, it is important to know the physical properties of the item, how many times it is picked in order to lessen walking time. Most trade-offs are expected when the structure is being designed, the arrangement of the storage area and how the equipment are handled. An example in electrical engineering, a negative response may be used in increasing trade growth for other properties. To enhance warehousing security mainly on people, the process of hiring the workers should be categorized as either formal or informal. In a facility, different kinds of technology can be used. For example, use of video cameras or in low-tech ensuring that fences is there. In processes, the frequency of how goods are handled can cause loss of goods or damage. If they are frequently handled then the risk of them getting damaged is

Mechanical testing of metals and polymers Assignment - 1

Mechanical testing of metals and polymers - Assignment Example 2. Procedure: Test Equipment Material Tested Test Speed mm/min Secant Tensile Strength-Metal Universal Tensile Testing machine 0.1% C Steel 0.4%C Steel 0.8%C Steel 1.15%C Steel 50 Tensile Strength-Plastics Universal Tensile Testing machine HDPE,PP-PE, PVC, PC, Acetal (POM), Nylon (PA66), GRN (PA66+glass fibres) 10, 50 & 500 Pendulum Impact Tests Zwick/Roell Pendulum Impact Tester PVC, POLYCARBONATE, NYLON 66, HDPE, ACETAL 7.5J Force Vickers hardness Test Vickers Testing Machine 0.1% C Steel 0.2%C Steel 0.4%C Steel 0.85%C Steel 20 Kg load for (2) minutes 3. Results Red 0.1% C Steel Green 0.4%C Steel Blue 0.8%C Steel Orange 1.15%C Steel Fmax Fmax dL at Fmax FBreak dL at break Nr N/mm? N mm N mm 1 414.53 8302.90 6.4 2020 10.7 2 691.64 13853.22 4.9 3930 8.1 3 896.10 17948.63 4.3 6720 5.6 4 1108.75 11098.39 2.7 4030 3.4 dL = Strain Hardness of carbon steels (load 20Kg) 1st measurement 2nd measurement 3rd measurement 0.1% Carbon 146 148 153 0.2% Carbon 166 162 170 0.4% Carbon 209 213 217 0 .85% Carbon 255 259 251 Zwick/Roell Pendulum Impact Tester. 1-Jun-15 M/c Model No 5113. Ref No A466690. ... 1.55 20.62 32.98 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 6 15.44 2.97 45.86 0.45 6.03 9.86 Charpy 7.50 Series Specimen width b0 Specimen thickness a0 Cross-section Impact energy Impact energy Impact resistance Work contents n = 5 mm mm mm? J % kJ/m? J x 15.82 2.978 47.11 0.38 5.05 8.03 7.50 s 0.3013 0.01304 1.074 0.09 1.16 1.80 0.00 ? 1.90 0.44 2.28 22.89 22.89 22.44 0.00 Zwick/Roell Pendulum Impact Tester. 1-Jun-15 M/c Model No 5113. Ref No A466690. Force 7.5J Material: POLYCARBONATE Specimen width b0 Specimen thickness a0 Cross-section Impact energy Impact energy Impact resistance Type of test, PIT Work contents Legends Nr mm mm mm? J % kJ/m? J â€Å" 1 15.82 3.11 49.2 2.29 30.50 46.49 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 2 15.5 3.12 48.36 2.39 31.93 49.52 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 3 16.01 3.11 49.79 2.44 32.55 49.03 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 4 15.99 3.12 49.89 2.23 29.69 44.63 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 5 15.39 3.16 48.63 2.28 30.40 46.88 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 6 15.81 3.09 48.85 2.47 32.96 50.60 Charpy 7.50 Series Specimen width b0 Spec imen thickness a0 Cross-section Impact energy Impact energy Impact resistance Work contents n = 6 mm mm mm? J % kJ/m? J x 15.75 3.118 49.12 2.35 31.34 47.86 7.50 s 0.2552 0.02317 0.622 0.10 1.32 2.23 0.00 ? 1.62 0.74 1.27 4.22 4.22 4.66 0.00 Zwick/Roell Pendulum Impact Tester . 1-Jun-15 M/c Model No 5113. Ref No A466690. Force 7.5J Material: NYLON 66 Specimen width b0 Specimen thickness a0 Cross-section Impact energy Impact energy Impact resistance Type of test, PIT Work contents Legends Nr mm mm mm? J % kJ/m? J â€Å" 1 15.35 3.19 48.97 3.61 48.18 73.80 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 2 16.1 3.19 51.36 4.88 65.02 94.95 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 3 16.05 3.22 51.68 4.64 61.83 89.73 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 4 16.1 3.2 51.52 4.50 60.05 87.42 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 5 16 3.18 50.88 4.66 62.14 91.60 Charpy 7.50 â€Å" 6 15.98 3.2 51.14 4.07 54.32 79.67 Charpy 7.50

Concept of Natural Legal Personality in English Law

Concept of Natural Legal Personality in English Law Discuss the   drawing examples from your studies, bibliography. Natural law is the law that exists independently of the positive law of a given political order, society or nation state. As a genre, natural law is the law of nature that is the theory that some things are as they are because they are. The central theme of the theory us that there are natural rights that are given to every human being by God.[1] Legal personality has been defined to express the ability of self to remove himself from all particularities such as family, personal history, social and cultural background and to become abstract and indeterminate. Legal recognition is a type of recognition based on the minimum commonality of people and not on the differences and individual characteristics which make them unique individuals.[2] A legal person is a bearer of subjective right.[3] Legal personality can either be natural or juristic. Natural legal personality is therefore the legal status allocated to every human being by the mere fact of their existence by God. So, every body has Natural Legal Personality regardless of where they are from and under what political regime they live. Having said that, It is doubtful that this is highly relevant in England today. This essay focuses on the concept and illustrations of its applicability and limitations. The concept of natural legal personality is hardly ever mentioned these days. This is possibly because there are not many rights that are attributable to natural legal persons. Even in the realm of Public International Law where there are laws that are attributable to persons by the mere fact that they are human by way of human right provisions, enforceability for instance, is almost impossible in the absence of the state. In the realm of private law, where legal personality becomes more relevant, an individual’s autonomy exists only in a very restricted and figurative sense. A person cannot grant rights to himself because rights of one person necessary presupposes obligations on another and such a legal connection can only be made in conformity with an objective legal system by way of a consonant expression of will by the two parties. Even this legal connection only exists in so far as the contract is established by the objective law as a law-creating material fact. So, in private law, there is no complete autonomy.[4] The mere use of the word ‘legal’ seems to suggest the lack of such autonomy. Practical applications of the concept of Legal Personality exist. Sometimes, so-called natural ‘legal’ are restricted in their exercise of rights that have been attributed to others. In the realm of contract, the general rule in English Law is that anyone may enter into legally binding contracts if they want to. However, a restriction exists to the effect that minors as defined under the Family Law Reform Act 1969 and people that are mentally incompetent are incapable of entering into binding contracts except for the supply of necessaries.[5] In the case of Moulton v. Camroux[6], It was held that unsoundness of mind constituted an adequate defence in a case for the enforcement of a contract. Also under the realm of Contract Law, non natural persons are attributed rights that would normally only be attributed to natural persons. In the realm of criminal law, some categories of people may have their culpability reduced by virtue of their age or soundness of mind. A proved plea of insanity would mean that someone that has committed a crime is not punished in the same way other legal persons.[7] In the case of R v Sullivan[8], on a charge for causing grievous bodily harm, on appeal to the House of Lords, It was held that the trial court’s ruling of ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ was appropriate. The same applies if the person is underage. He or she is not punished the same way a fully grown adult would be. In the realm of company law, legal personality has been attributed to non natural persons. They are attributed with corporate personality. Such persons are known as juristic or artificial persons as opposed to natural persons. For legal purposes, they have the same rights and obligations as natural persons. They are capable of suing and being sued as an entity quite apart from the members. The implications of this personality were fully determined in the case of Salomon v Salomon[9]. In that case, It was held inter alia that at law, a company is a different entity from the subscribers to its memorandum of association. The members of a company are therefore not personally liable for its debts s that unless there are contrary provisions, the members are completely free form liability.[10] The above discussion seems to suggest that the concept of natural legal personality, if it actually exists, is not really relevant in English Law. The mere use of the word ‘legal’ would suggest the existence of a state or other body. There is also the problem of how the natural rights are determined since a right for one person necessary constitutes an obligation for another. This suggests the necessary existence of some sort of agreement by the two parties which in turn, needs to be governed by certain rules. In terms of practical application, most laws prescribe their own definitions of ‘legal persons’ and the limitations to this personality. The concept of natural legal personality does not exist in English Law and even if it did, It would merely be normative in nature and effect. Bibliography Davies, P. â€Å"Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law† (1998) London: Sweet and Mawell. Douzinas, C. and Gearey, A. â€Å"Critical Juriisprudence: The Political Philosophy of Justice† (2005) Oxford: Hart Publishing. Kelsen, H. â€Å"Introduction to the Problames of Legal Theory† (2002) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Neuhouser, F. (Eds) â€Å"Foundations of Natural Right† (2000) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Statute Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 Sale of Goods Act 1979 Cases Moulton v. Camroux 2 Ex 487 R v Sullivan [1983] 2 All ER 673 Salomon v Salomon [1897] A.C. 22 H.L. Web Resources The Free Dictionary http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/p/Natural+law> [1] The Free Dictionary http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/p/Natural+law> [2] Douzinas, C. and Gearey, A. â€Å"Critical Juriisprudence: The Political Philosophy of Justice† (2005) Oxford: Hart Publishing. Page 182 [3] Kelsen, H. â€Å"Introduction to the Problames of Legal Theory† (2002) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Page 39 [4] Kelsen, H. â€Å"Introduction to the Problames of Legal Theory† (2002) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Page 40. [5] Section 3 Sale of Goods Act 1979 [6] 2 Ex 487 [7] Under Sections 2(1) and 5 (1) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 [8] [1983] 2 All ER 673 [9] [1897] A.C. 22 H.L. [10] Davies, P. â€Å"Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law† (1998) London: Sweet and Mawell. Pages 77-78 and 80.

Consider the theme of loneliness in Of Mice and Men. How does it Essa

Consider the theme of loneliness in 'Of Mice and Men'. How does it affect the friendships and relationships in the novel? This novel that was written by John Steinbeck which was set in the 1930s in Salinas Soledad which is in California. The novel consists of many historical factors which have affected the characters in this novel and one of them includes "the great depression" Which leads the novels inspiration for the famous writer John Steinbeck which he mainly based on his own experience. In those days people travelled a lot differently to how we travel now. In those days migrant workers travelled extravagant distances looking for a job. There are many different themes in which are based throughout the whole book, such as loneliness, happiness, nature, dreams and reality: - Which even lead to catastrophe. Many of the people in this novel have very lonely lives mainly because they are migrant workers and as we know they don't have time to make any friends or have any time to spend with their families. There are many characters that are lonely due to age, sex, and race. Two good examples would be Candy because of his age and Crooks because of his race. This novel consists of two main characters George and Lennie, who are an anomalous pair of migrant workers that look after each other. They are completely the reverse of each other. George is the one who has the communicative face and thinks of all of their problems and ideas and tells the other one what to do. Being like this all of the time, in what ever the story it is, always pictures that you would be the small quick one with sharp features. Lennie is the guy that is tall and always does what he is told and has an ill-defined, solid, a... ... gets treated like a little girl. Curley's wife often dreams about herself becoming an actress. At the end of the novel, her loneliness causes Lennie's death. Before Lennie's death, Curley's wife and Lennie were talking in the barn whilst everyone else was playing games. They began talking to each other about each others dreams. They both talked about each others dreams and what they wanted to do in their life. Lennie has a fascination of stroking things. He was stroking Curley's wife's hair, he began to stroke her hair so hard, that he lost control and broke her neck. This has a big impact on George, Lennie and Candy's relationship, as Curley wants to kill Lennie. As a result to this, George has to kill Lennie before he gets killed by Curly. Loneliness will always end in tragedy and dreams will rarely become reality. Friendship never ends.

Compare/Contrast Essay

Swimming Indoors vs. Swimming at the Beach Swimming is a fun and leisurely activity that can be enjoyed indoors or outdoors. Swimming pools are generally located indoors inside of homes, hotels, recreation centers or places where people would normally go to take a load off and relax. Beaches are strewn about outdoors along many coast lines throughout the world providing a haven for swimmers and other beach goers. To enjoy a swim indoors at the pool, or outdoors at the beach, can be a tough choice since both can provide a variety of experiences.This essay aims to contrast those experiences by talking about some of the temperatures in the environment at the swimming pool and at the beach; the activities that can be done there, the cleanliness that can generally be found in the areas and some of the safety measures that are typically in place at both locations. I’ll first discuss indoor swimming pools. Normally, indoor pools have a temperature gauge that can be set so that the te mperature of the pool’s water will always remain the same. While the temperature of the water in the pool can remain constant, so can the temperature of the room that the swimming pool is located in.This means that swimmers can have their ideal temperatures set for when they walk into the swimming area and their ideal temperatures set for when they step foot into the swimming pool. It’s hard to find better swimming conditions than that. Activities like water polo, water volleyball and water aerobics can be enjoyed in indoor swimming pools because the water temperatures there are usually set to a warmer temperature that can be enjoyed year round. With indoor pools there are usually chlorine tablets floating somewhere out of sight to help with the cleanliness of the water.There is a modicum of relief knowing that most indoor pools have a chlorine and septic system to help maintain the cleanliness of the water. Cleanliness is next to the safeness of indoor swimming pools. Indoor pools are safe from the weather which leaves the pool water free from leaves, dirt and other debris. This makes swimming indoors ideal compared to what may be experienced outdoors at the beach. While outdoors at the beach, temperatures can range from a sweltering heat, to a blustering cold, depending on the type of day it is outside. This means that temperatures in the waters will roughly match the temperatures of the weather outside.This is not always ideal for swimming. The beach is enjoyed mostly on hot summer days where the most outdoor activities can be done. Some of those activities can be surfing, jet skiing, body boarding, fishing, jogging, tanning, windsurfing and a bevy of other activities not just committed to being inside of the water. However, with a lot of activity comes a lot of waste. Beaches will commonly have trash and debris littered about since they are more frequented by beach goers and the waters at the beach can wash up waste along the shorelines where beachgoers spend their time at.Most beaches have plenty of trash depositories and staff in place to help maintain the cleanliness of the beach, but it can become more difficult to control compared to an indoor swimming pool because its size. Swimmers may be reluctant to venture into beach waters since the safety of the waters can put swimmers at risk. Sharks, jellyfish and other dangerous sea life are always a threat when swimming at the beach. While it isn’t always effective, beaches do try to contain this threat with various nets to prevent them from wading into the swimming areas.This can make swimming at the beach a bit unsafe, but most people still find plenty of pleasure in the waters regardless of the threat since there are so many activities that can be done while there. Whether it’s to enjoy the consistent temperatures of the indoor pools, or the multitude of activities that can be done while at the beach, there is certainly a degree of entertainment, relaxat ion and, at times – risk, that can be found while swimming at either location. I prefer the sanctuary of an indoor, heated and clean swimming pool over the outdoor, sometimes shark infested, volatile waters of the beach. Compare/Contrast Essay The Battle of Somme Abstract From 1914 through 1918 the world was at war. Described as â€Å"The Great One†, World War 1 affected everyone; man, and woman, combatant and non-combatant. This was a war defined by the advent of new technology. World War 1 saw the implementation of the Machine-gun in 1914, the armored tank in 1916, and, with the advent of the airplane in 1903, the first fixed wing airplane modified for combat occurred in 1911. The perspective of combat had also changed. What had once been a stand in rank and fire at the enemy across vast fields had become a war fought in the trenches.The lone presence of an isolated field doctor had become that of an entire medical corps stationed behind the lines in vast field hospitals waiting to tend to the wounded. The very nature and scale of war had changed drastically. As a result, where you were, whose side you were on, and the role you fulfilled, the same battle had very different ramifications and opposing perspectives. This essay will discuss the contrasting views between Private Ernst Junger, a German shock troop in Storm of Steel to that of Vera Brittain, a British nurse in Testament of Youth, through one of the bloodiest and most decisive battles of World War 1. World War I†, â€Å"The Great War†, as suggested by these references, was a confrontation on a global scale unlike any other war in history. For the first time technology had changed the face of armed conflict, the landscape of battle had transformed its mission from two forces firing upon each other across broad fields with muskets and cannons to a vast subterranean trench system that traversed hundreds of miles. Between the opposing forces lay barren waste lands covered by machine gun fire and directional barbed wire.These fields were aptly known as â€Å"no-man’s land†. The trench systems and adjacent wastelands covered the distance of what had once been empty fields between opposing forces to spanning the borders between multiple countries forcing unimaginable gridlock, standoffs lasting not days, but months, as in the Battle of Somme, and even years in rare occasions. It was not only the landscape of battle that had changed but also the personnel.In 1901 the Army Nurses Corps was established and in 1908 the Navy Nurse’s Corps was created. Women were an official part of the war effort and by the end of World War 1 their numbers had grown from an initial 8,000 members to an astounding 70,000, a sight and valuable perspective unseen in any previous war. After reading the books Storm of Steel by Ernst Junger and Testament of Youth by Vera Brittain, I contemplated on how best to highlight the subtle comparisons and stark contrasts that appear in both texts.I originally thought that nothing jumped off these pages; that there was no clear delineation; after all, he was a trained soldier, and she was nurse; where he was on the front lines unleashing chaos, she was in the hospital car ing for wounded; while he was an aggressor she was on the defensive; and as he chased glory, she chased love. Then it occurred to me that as I read, one word had been featured prominently in both texts: â€Å"Somme†. Somme, a battle in which both participants had a role; a battle that, no matter the outcome, both authors had a perspective and both perspectives were clearly different.This would be my focus. First and foremost for the unaware, a little background about Somme, also known as the Somme Offensive; the battle took place between July 1, and November 18, 1916 at the river Somme in France. During the battle the British Expeditionary Force and the French Army mounted a joint offensive against the German Army that had occupied most of northern France since 1914. The Battle of the Somme was one of the largest battles of the war. By the time fighting paused in the fall of 1916, the forces involved had suffered more than 1 million casualties, making it the bloodiest militar y operation ever recorded.With those numbers it should come as no surprise that both authors would have a unique and pointed perspective on that front. From the German shock troop’s vantage point, although the British were aggressing, the attempt would be in vain. â€Å". . . while the British made various, fortunately unsuccessful, attempts on our lives, either by means of high angled machine-gun fire or sweeping the road with shrapnel. We were especially irritated by one machine-gunner who sprayed his bullets at such an angle that they came down vertically, with acceleration produced by gravity.There was no point trying to duck behind walls. † (Junger, 2004) In this passage the author practically mocks the British effort of a mounted attack on the clearly superior German forces finding a single machine-gunner merely irritating. Meanwhile beyond the wire, past the vast no-man’s land, and safely behind the friendly lines of the British army, the account of Briti sh Nurse Vera Brittain is starkly different. In contrast as she tends to those being brought to the nearest hospital, her vivid account of waiting for the inbound shipment of wounded paints a graphic picture of how grim the situation appeared. Throughout those â€Å"busy and strenuous days† the wards sweltered beneath their roofs of corrugated iron; the prevailing odour of wounds and stinking streets lingered perpetually in our nostrils, . . . Day after day I had to fight the queer, frightening sensation-to which, throughout my years of nursing, I never became accustomed-of seeing the covered stretchers come in, one after another, without knowing, until I ran with pounding heart to look, what fearful sight or sound or stench, what problem of agony or imminent death, each brown blanket concealed. (Brittain, 1933) Although Nurse Vera Brittain was safe and nowhere near the front line her account of the Somme offensive is drawn from a direct line of sight of the carnage that was being produced on the field of battle is in bold contrast to that of the German shock troop located directly on the frontline.While Brittain was well away from the firing, Private Junger was in the line of fire, yet he was tucked safely away in his protected trench line unable to physically see the battle, she was witness to the horror of bodies produced by the battle. She was a non-combatant in support of the war effort duty bound to care for the wounded, he was a trained soldier on the front line trained to administer death. Their accounts of the very same battle differ greatly in perspective.History would later show that both perspectives although correct are not an indication of inevitability. Both perspectives were correct in that on the first day of the offensive July 1, 1916 the Germans easily handled the British attack. Their newly implemented machine-guns and directional barbed wire amassed a record setting 58,000 casualties on the first day, this is why private Junger was so easily tucked away in his protected entrenchment while nurse Brittain saw nothing but death.The British would ultimately prove victorious at the battle of Somme, on November 18, 1916 when the offensive was called off the British had pushed roughly six miles past the German lines winning the battle of Somme, however the war would continue for nearly two more years. Finally on November 11, 1918 the Armistice of Compiegne was signed marking a victory for the allies and complete defeat for Germany, yet â€Å"The war to end all wars† as it was called by H.G Wells in August of 1914 in total would cost more money and damage more property than any previous war and would amass 27 million casualties before it was over. References Brittain, V. (1933). Testament of Youth. (pp. 279-280). New York: Penguin Classics. Duffy, M. (2009). Battles- the Battle of Somme. Battles- The Western Front, Retrieved from http://www. firstworldwar. com/battles/somme. htm Junger, E. (2004). Storm of Stee l. (p. 78). Strand, London: Penguin Books.